Test

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine AAMC PREview Test Questions

AAMC Preparation Specialists

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine Overview

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine is dedicated to cultivating physicians who can address the diverse needs of communities with compassion and excellence. Embracing diversity and fostering a culture of collaboration, the institution provides a nurturing learning environment for all aspiring medical professionals.

How is the AAMC PREview Used?

As part of the admissions process, the Long School of Medicine uses either the AAMC PREview exam or the CASPer exam to assess the pre-professionalism knowledge and potential of applicants. The AAMC PREview is a standardized test that presents hypothetical scenarios that medical students may encounter, allowing candidates to evaluate the effectiveness of various behavioral responses.

Question Bank

Make Use of Our Question Bank, with More than 200 Questions, All with Detailed Answers from Doctors.

Tutoring & Prep

One to One Support From an Experienced Medical Admissions Tutors, Ensuring an Optimal Preparation Process.

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School Mock Interviews

Get 1-1 Past Paper Support From One of Our Experienced Medical Tutors.

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Scenarios & Responses

A senior professor at the medical school is engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a medical student, which is causing discomfort and ethical concerns within the academic community.

Response 1: Confront the professor privately, expressing concern about the inappropriate nature of their relationship with the student and emphasizing the potential consequences for both parties.
Answer Options: Very Ineffective / Ineffective / Effective / Very Effective

Correct Answer with Explanation: Very Effective.
Addressing the issue directly with the professor allows for immediate intervention and highlights the importance of maintaining professional boundaries in academic settings.

Response 2: Report the situation to the institution’s ethics committee or relevant authorities, ensuring a formal investigation and appropriate action are taken to address the misconduct.
Answer Options: Very Ineffective / Ineffective / Effective / Very Effective

Correct Answer with Explanation: Very Effective.
Escalating the issue to higher authorities ensures transparency and accountability, safeguarding the well-being and integrity of the academic environment.

Response 3: Ignore the situation, assuming it is not your responsibility as a student to intervene in the personal affairs of faculty members, and continue focusing on academic pursuits.
Answer Options: Very Ineffective / Ineffective / Effective / Very Effective

Correct Answer with Explanation: Ineffective.
Ignoring misconduct perpetuates a culture of silence and tolerance, potentially enabling further harm and compromising the ethical standards of the institution.

Response 4: Provide support and guidance to the affected medical student, offering resources for confidential counseling and assistance in navigating the challenges associated with the situation.
Answer Options: Very Ineffective / Ineffective / Effective / Very Effective

Correct Answer with Explanation: Effective.
Prioritizing the well-being of the student affected by the inappropriate relationship demonstrates empathy and support, fostering a culture of care within the academic community.

Response 5: Discuss the situation with trusted peers or mentors, seeking advice on how to address the issue sensitively and effectively while protecting the interests of all parties involved.
Answer Options: Very Ineffective / Ineffective / Effective / Very Effective

Correct Answer with Explanation: Effective.
Seeking guidance from experienced individuals helps to ensure a thoughtful and strategic approach to addressing the ethical dilemma, promoting accountability and resolution.

AAMC Professional Readiness Preparation

Tailor and optimise your AAMC preparation with our experienced Medicin tutors.

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Scenarios

A medical student persuades an older student to complete coursework on their behalf, violating academic integrity policies and compromising the learning process.

Response 1: Confront the student engaging in academic dishonesty privately, emphasizing the seriousness of their actions and encouraging them to take responsibility for their own academic work.

Response 2: Report the incident to the academic dean or relevant faculty members, providing evidence of the academic misconduct and advocating for disciplinary action in accordance with institutional policies.

Response 3: Offer support and resources to the student struggling with coursework, such as tutoring services or academic counseling, to address underlying challenges and prevent future instances of academic misconduct.

Response 4: Engage in dialogue with faculty members or academic advisors to review and strengthen academic integrity policies and procedures, emphasizing the importance of preventive measures and proactive interventions to address academic misconduct effectively.

Response 5: Encourage the student to come forward voluntarily and disclose their involvement in academic dishonesty, offering them the opportunity to rectify their actions through honesty and accountability.

You can find more questions in our Question Bank here.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course