Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah AAMC PREview Test Questions

AAMC Preparation Specialists

Spencer Fox Eccles School of Med School Overview

The Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah follows a comprehensive admissions process that emphasizes a holistic review of applicants. Beyond meeting minimum MCAT and GPA requirements, candidates are evaluated based on their academic achievements, extracurricular activities, and personal attributes. The school values diversity and considers applicants’ abilities to balance various responsibilities as indicators of their potential as future physicians. It’s important to note that applicants interested in the MSTP program must also fulfill specific criteria for that program. Starting from the 2023-2024 application cycle, the school no longer accepts Early Decision Program (EDP) applications due to recent legal considerations regarding the use of race and ethnicity in admissions.

How is the AAMC PREview Used?

As of 2023, applicants to the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine are required to complete the AAMC PREview exam (formerly known as the AAMC SJT) as part of the admissions process. This exam assesses candidates’ pre-professional competencies across various domains essential for success in medical school and beyond. The school utilizes the PREview scores to evaluate applicants’ readiness for medical education, ensuring alignment with the institution’s mission and goals.

Question Bank

Make Use of Our Question Bank, with More than 200 Questions, All with Detailed Answers from Doctors.

Tutoring & Prep

One to One Support From an Experienced Medical Admissions Tutors, Ensuring an Optimal Preparation Process.

Spencer Fox Eccles School Mock Interviews

Get 1-1 Past Paper Support From One of Our Experienced Medical Tutors.

Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Questions & Answers

The AAMC PREview exam includes scenarios designed to evaluate applicants’ professional judgment and decision-making skills. Here’s an example question:

Scenario: You witness a fellow medical student cheating during an exam by accessing unauthorized materials on their phone.

Response 1: Confront the student immediately and report the incident to the appropriate authorities.

Correct Answer with Explanation: Very Effective.
Upholding academic integrity is crucial in medical education, and reporting cheating incidents demonstrates commitment to ethical conduct.

Response 2: Ignore the situation and focus on completing your own exam without distractions.

Correct Answer with Explanation: Ineffective.
Ignoring cheating undermines the principles of academic honesty and can have serious consequences for the integrity of medical education.

Response 3: Confront the student privately after the exam and advise them to stop cheating to avoid getting caught.

Correct Answer with Explanation: Ineffective.
Addressing cheating privately may enable dishonest behavior to continue unchecked and fails to uphold academic standards.

Response 4: Discuss the incident with classmates to gather opinions on how to handle the situation before taking any action.

Correct Answer with Explanation: Ineffective.
Seeking peer advice does not absolve the responsibility to report academic misconduct and may delay appropriate intervention.

Response 5: Report the cheating incident anonymously to the school’s academic integrity committee.

Correct Answer with Explanation: Effective.
Reporting the incident anonymously allows for appropriate action while protecting the reporter’s identity and promoting a culture of academic honesty.

AAMC Professional Readiness Preparation

Tailor and optimise your AAMC preparation with our experienced Medicin tutors.

Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Questions

During a clinical rotation, you observe a senior resident making derogatory remarks about a patient's cultural background in front of the medical team.

Response 1: Remain silent to avoid conflict with the senior resident and continue with your assigned tasks.

Response 2: Challenge the senior resident’s behavior privately after the patient interaction and express your concerns about cultural sensitivity.

Response 3: Immediately intervene during the interaction and address the senior resident’s inappropriate comments to prevent further harm to the patient.

Response 4: Document the incident and report it to the appropriate authority figures within the medical institution.

Response 5: Engage the patient directly to mitigate the impact of the senior resident’s remarks and ensure their comfort and dignity are preserved.

Scenario: During a group project, you notice that one of your team members consistently fails to contribute to the workload, resulting in a disproportionate burden on other team members.

Response 1: Confront the team member privately and express your concerns about their lack of contribution, offering assistance if needed.

Response 2: Ignore the problem and take on the extra workload yourself to ensure the project’s success.

Response 3: Discuss the situation with other team members to gather their perspectives before deciding on a course of action.

Response 4: Speak to the project supervisor or instructor about the unequal distribution of work within the team.

Response 5: Confront the team member publicly during a group meeting to hold them accountable for their lack of contribution.

You can find more questions in our Question Bank here.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course