Test

Serle Court Chambers: Pupillage Interview Past Questions and Statistics

Pupillage Application Specialists

Serle Court Chambers: Key Information

Serle Court Chambers is renowned for fostering a warm and inclusive environment while maintaining a rigorous commitment to excellence in the field of commercial and chancery practice. With a strong focus on balance between work and personal life, the Chambers proudly encourages candidates from diverse backgrounds to apply. Under the leadership of Elizabeth Jones KC, Head of Chambers, Serle Court offers a 12-month pupillage program that emphasises collaboration rather than competition among pupils. Working alongside leading legal minds, pupils engage with a broad spectrum of business law cases, benefiting from tailored advocacy training and supportive mentoring. Unlike many Chambers, the focus at Serle Court is on individual merit rather than competitive exercises. This unique approach has resulted in a high rate of tenancy offers to recent pupils. Serle Court’s commitment to ‘consistent high quality’ is reflected in its selection process, seeking candidates with analytical ability, sound judgement, and potential as outstanding advocates. In addition to a minimum 2:1 degree classification, the Chambers looks for qualities such as practicality, client relationship skills, approachability, and supportiveness in its potential pupils, seeking to nurture these attributes throughout the pupillage.

Online Course

Techniques, Tutorials & Past Pupillage Interview Questions & Model Answers

Pupillage Interview Tuition

One to One Support With A Pupillage Interview Specialist. Your First Choice Chambers.

Resources & Articles

Tips, Techniques & Insight from Interviewers & Current Barristers.

Serle Court Chambers: Interview Information

Serle Court Chambers’ interview process is designed to identify candidates with both potential and a strong alignment with the Chambers’ values. Initially, all applications are anonymized and reviewed by at least two members of the Chambers, following specific selection criteria. Around 30 candidates are invited to a first interview, lasting 35 minutes, conducted by a three-member panel. This year, the Chambers is also introducing an online situational judgement test to further enhance the diversity of recruitment. This additional step may create opportunities for more first-round interviews. From the initial interviews, about ten candidates progress to a second round, focusing on a mock client conference. Candidates are given 40 minutes to prepare for a 30-minute conference where they deliver advice to panel members acting as clients or solicitors, showcasing their ability to apply legal knowledge in a practical setting.

Admissions Statistics

Percentage of Applicants Interviewed
Overall Success Rate (Total Applicants : Total Spaces)
Percentage of Applicants Receiving an Offer
Overall Success Rate (Total Applicants : Total Spaces)
Pupillage Interview Services

Tailor and optimise your Pupillage Application with our 1-1 Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Pupillage Interview Question Bank & Online Course

Serle Court Chambers Application Questions and Answers

"Fair recruitment is more important in regulated professions (such as the Bar) than other careers". Do you agree? In no more than 500 words, identify some of the arguments in favour of and against this position.

I agree that fair recruitment is more important in regulated professions like the Bar than in other careers. In regulated professions, especially in the legal sector, professionals are entrusted with significant societal responsibilities and uphold public trust. Fair recruitment ensures that individuals selected for these roles possess the requisite skills, ethics, and integrity crucial for such high-stake professions. It’s vital to maintain public confidence in these sectors, which can be significantly impacted by perceptions of unfair or biased recruitment practices.

In contrast, while fair recruitment is important in all professions, the immediate societal impact of unfair practices may be less severe in non-regulated fields. However, it’s essential to recognize that fair recruitment across all sectors is crucial for promoting diversity, inclusivity, and equal opportunity.

In favor of the proposition, the arguments include the need for maintaining high ethical standards, ensuring public trust, and upholding the integrity of professions that significantly influence public life and policy. Against the proposition, one might argue that emphasising fair recruitment as more important in certain professions could inadvertently downplay its significance in other sectors, potentially leading to less focus on equitable practices in those areas.

A clause in a commercial (business to business) contract provides:"The seller's maximum aggregate liability to the buyer under or in connection with the contract, including any liability arising out of or relating to the performance and/or breach and/or termination of the contract, shall in no case exceed £1 million." The clause is expressly stated not to apply to claims for personal injury or death caused by the seller's negligence or breach of statutory duty. Assume that the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 does not apply. In your view, does this clause cap liability for a negligent misrepresentation made by the seller that induced the buyer to contract? Please explain the basis for your view in no more than 500 words.

In my view, the contractual clause capping the seller’s liability at £1 million does not necessarily cap liability for negligent misrepresentation. Typically, clauses capping liability are intended to limit financial exposure for breaches of contractual terms, rather than pre-contractual misstatements like negligent misrepresentation. The exclusion of claims for personal injury or death due to negligence suggests a focus on direct contractual obligations and damages, not on misrepresentations made during the negotiation or formation of the contract.

The interpretation of such clauses often depends on the specific wording and context. If the clause explicitly excludes liability for misrepresentation or is ambiguous in this regard, it may not apply to negligent misrepresentation. Courts tend to scrutinize these clauses carefully, particularly in cases of misrepresentation, to ensure they do not unfairly limit the remedies available to the aggrieved party. Therefore, the applicability of this liability cap to negligent misrepresentation claims would likely require a detailed legal analysis of the contract and surrounding circumstances.

Identify a piece of exceptional oral advocacy that you have seen in a non-legal context. Please choose a piece of advocacy that is widely known, and from the last decade. In no more than 500 words, please explain what you consider made it stand out, and how it could have been improved.​

Killer Mike’s speech during the Atlanta protests in 2020 exemplifies exceptional oral advocacy in a non-legal context. He delivered this speech amidst the civil unrest following George Floyd’s death, addressing a community grappling with intense emotions and the urge for drastic action. His speech, imbued with personal passion and a deep understanding of the community’s sentiment, resonated profoundly with the audience.

What distinguished Killer Mike’s advocacy was his ability to channel the collective anger and frustration into a constructive dialogue. He did not just express solidarity; he provided a perspective that was both grounding and forward-looking. He acknowledged the pain and anger felt by many but urged against destructive actions, emphasising the importance of strategic, organised responses to injustice.

His speech was a blend of emotional appeal and rational thought. He connected with his audience by sharing his personal struggles and experiences, making his message relatable and authentic. This personal touch added a layer of credibility and sincerity to his words.

However, the speech could have been enhanced by including more specific recommendations for action. While he successfully captured the emotional essence of the moment, providing a clearer roadmap for change could have added an actionable element to his powerful words. Suggesting specific steps for community engagement or highlighting concrete strategies for advocacy and reform would have given the audience a more direct way to channel their emotions into positive action.

This speech stands as a testament to the power of words to comfort, inspire, and mobilise, especially in times of societal upheaval.

Serle Court Chambers Past and Example Interview Questions

Analytical Ability & Legal Acumen

  • How do you approach complex legal problems, and can you provide an example from your studies or work?
  • How would you ensure that your advice to a client is legally sound yet practical?
  • Describe a situation where you had to interpret complex legal information for a non-legal audience.
  • Can you discuss a recent legal development that may impact commercial or chancery practice?
  • Explain your thought process in tackling a challenging legal scenario, considering different perspectives.
  • How do you stay abreast of changes in business law?
  • How would you balance legal compliance with commercial considerations in a given scenario?
  • Describe an instance where you needed to analyse a legal document with meticulous attention to detail.

Client Relationships & Communication Skills

  • How would you build and maintain trust with a client?
  • Can you discuss an occasion when you had to persuade someone to see things your way?
  • How would you handle a situation where a client is unhappy with your advice?
  • Describe your approach to explaining complex legal terms to a client without legal training.
  • How would you ensure effective communication within a diverse team?
  • How do you adapt your communication style to different audiences?

Professional Values & Inclusivity

  • How do you align with Serle Court’s commitment to inclusivity and balance in professional life?
  • How have you demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion in your previous roles or studies?
  • Can you discuss an experience where you worked in a collaborative rather than competitive environment?
  • How do you handle stress and maintain work-life balance?
  • What steps would you take to create an inclusive environment within a legal team?
  • How have you shown resilience in the face of professional challenges?

Practical Approach & Sound Judgment

  • Provide an example of a situation where you needed to exercise sound judgement under pressure.
  • How do you approach making decisions when faced with incomplete or ambiguous information?
  • Can you describe a situation where you had to change your approach midway through a case or project?
  • How do you ensure that your legal strategies align with the practical needs of a client?
  • What steps do you take to ensure that your decisions are both ethically sound and effective?
  • How do you evaluate the potential risks and benefits of a particular legal course of action?

Pupillage Online Course & Question Bank

Articles & Resources

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course