Public Health SJT Sample Questions Review
Public Health Application Specialists
The Situational Judgement Test (SJT) is a significant part of the selection process for aspiring Public Health Registrars. It provides an opportunity for candidates to demonstrate their understanding and aptitude in dealing with real-world scenarios they might encounter in their professional journey. In this article, we delve into a ‘most appropriate’ style question and a ‘ranking question’, considering their intricacies and shedding light on the rationale behind the choices. You can find many more fully-explained questions in our question bank.
Techniques, Tutorials & Past SJT Interview Questions & Model Answers
Public Health SJT Tuition
One to One Support With A UK Doctor Experienced in the SJT Process.
Resources & Articles
Tips, Techniques & Insight from Doctors & Public Health Insiders.
Sample Question 1: Most Appropriate Style
You are a Public Health Registrar. During a community meeting, a heated debate ensues regarding the implementation of a new vaccination program. A group of parents are vociferously against it due to misinformation.
Choose the three most appropriate actions to take in this scenario:
- Address the concerns by providing accurate information regarding the vaccination program.
- Dismiss the concerns as baseless without further discussion.
- Document the concerns and the discussion for future reference.
- Engage in a heated argument to defend the vaccination program.
- Offer to organise a separate informational session to further discuss the vaccination program.
- Ignore the concerns and proceed with the vaccination program as planned.
- Seek the support of community leaders to address the misinformation.
- Report the incident to your immediate superior.
Answer: A, C, E
The scenario depicted in the question is a quintessential representation of the challenges Public Health Registrars may encounter in the field, particularly when introducing new health programs. The correct choices reflect a balanced approach towards addressing concerns, maintaining professional conduct, and ensuring the accurate dissemination of information.
- Option A: Addressing concerns by providing accurate information is pivotal. It demonstrates a willingness to engage with the community and correct misinformation, which is crucial in Public Health initiatives.
- Option C: Documenting the concerns and discussion is a prudent step. It not only provides a record of the event but also serves as a reference for future engagements, aiding in the development of strategies to address similar concerns.
- Option E: Offering to organise a separate informational session portrays a proactive and open approach, creating a platform for further discussion and education regarding the vaccination program.
The incorrect options either exhibit a lack of engagement (B, F), unprofessional conduct (D), or might not be as immediately effective in addressing the concerns at hand (G, H).
This question essentially tests a candidate’s communication skills, professionalism, and ability to handle opposition or misinformation in a community setting, all of which are vital competencies for a Public Health Registrar. Through careful review of such questions, candidates can hone their understanding and approach towards tackling the diverse scenarios they may encounter in the SJT and, by extension, in their professional life.
Public Health Registrar SJT Services
Tailor and optimise your SJT Application with our 1-1 Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Question Bank & Online Course
Sample Question 2: Ranking Style
As a Public Health Registrar, you are tasked with coordinating a multidisciplinary team to address a sudden outbreak of a contagious disease in a local community. The situation is tense as the local media is covering the outbreak extensively. Amidst this, a team member expresses concern about the lack of clear communication within the team, which is affecting the coordination and the overall response to the outbreak.
Rank the following actions from most appropriate to least appropriate:
- Allocate a dedicated time each day for team meetings to discuss progress and address concerns.
- Ignore the communication concerns as addressing the outbreak is the priority.
- Reach out to the media to provide accurate information and prevent panic among the community.
- Create a communication protocol to ensure everyone is updated and concerns are addressed promptly.
- Address the concerned team member privately and assure them that communication will improve.
Answer: D, A, E, C, B
The scenario encapsulated in this question challenges the candidate’s ability to balance urgent public health needs against the essential dynamics of team coordination and communication. It’s a delicate tableau of prioritising immediate actions while fostering a conducive working environment amidst a crisis.
- Option D: Establishing a communication protocol is deemed the most appropriate as it directly addresses the concern raised, ensuring everyone is updated and concerns are addressed promptly, which is crucial for effective coordination in managing the outbreak.
- Option A: Allocating a dedicated time for daily team meetings is also a strong measure. It not only addresses the communication concern but provides a structured platform for discussions, ensuring that everyone is on the same page regarding the response efforts.
- Option E: Addressing the concerned team member privately shows a good level of empathy and understanding. However, it may not immediately resolve the communication issues within the team.
- Option C: While reaching out to the media to provide accurate information is important to manage public anxiety, it may not directly address the internal communication concern within the team, hence its lower ranking.
- Option B: Ignoring the communication concerns could potentially exacerbate the coordination issues, affecting the overall response to the outbreak, making it the least appropriate action.
SJT Online Course & Question Bank
Articles & Resources