Test

Morehouse School of Medicine AAMC PREview Test Questions

AAMC Preparation Specialists

Morehouse School of Medicine School Overview

Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) takes a comprehensive approach to evaluating applicants, seeking individuals who excel academically and demonstrate a strong commitment to serving underserved communities. Located in Georgia, MSM prioritizes applicants who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents and have established Georgia residency for at least 12 months before matriculation.

How is the AAMC PREview Used?

As part of its thorough screening process, MSM requires applicants to complete the AAMC PREview Professional Readiness Exam. The PREview enables the admissions committee to assess applicants’ pre-professional competencies beyond academic qualifications.

The exam evaluates skills such as cultural competence, ethical responsibility, resilience, service orientation, teamwork, oral communication, and critical thinking. These attributes are essential for future physicians, particularly in providing care to underserved communities, aligning with MSM’s mission. By integrating the PREview, MSM can identify applicants who embody the professional qualities necessary for success in medical practice.

Question Bank

Make Use of Our Question Bank, with More than 200 Questions, All with Detailed Answers from Doctors.

Tutoring & Prep

One to One Support From an Experienced Medical Admissions Tutors, Ensuring an Optimal Preparation Process.

Morehouse School Mock Interviews

Get 1-1 Past Paper Support From One of Our Experienced Medical Tutors.

Morehouse School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Scenarios & Responses

The PREview presents scenarios to gauge applicants’ responses.

As a medical student, you observe a fellow student engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a patient. The patient appears uncomfortable with the situation, but your peer brushes off your concerns when confronted.

Response 1: Report the incident to the appropriate authorities or supervisor, ensuring patient safety and ethical conduct are prioritized.

Explanation: This response demonstrates professionalism and adherence to ethical standards by taking action to protect the patient’s well-being and uphold professional boundaries.

Response 2: Confront the peer again, urging them to reconsider their actions and emphasizing the potential consequences for both the patient and their medical career.

Explanation: While well-intentioned, confronting the peer without involving authorities may not adequately address the seriousness of the situation or protect the patient’s interests.

Response 3: Ignore the situation, assuming it’s not your responsibility to intervene in your peer’s personal affairs.

Explanation: This response neglects ethical obligations to advocate for patient welfare and may perpetuate harm by allowing the inappropriate relationship to continue unchecked.

Response 4: Seek guidance from a trusted faculty member or mentor on the best course of action, ensuring confidentiality is maintained while addressing the issue.

Explanation: Consulting with experienced professionals can provide valuable insights and support in navigating sensitive ethical dilemmas while upholding professional standards.

Response 5: Encourage the patient to report the incident directly to the appropriate authorities, empowering them to take control of their own well-being and ensure their concerns are addressed.

Explanation: Empowering the patient to advocate for themselves reinforces patient autonomy and ensures their voice is heard in addressing potential misconduct.

During clinical rotations, you notice a healthcare provider repeatedly failing to follow proper infection control protocols, potentially endangering patients and staff.

Response 1: Immediately bring the issue to the attention of the supervisor or infection control officer, emphasizing the urgency of addressing the breach to prevent harm.

Explanation: This proactive approach prioritizes patient safety and underscores the importance of adhering to established health and safety standards in healthcare settings.

Response 2: Confront the healthcare provider directly, expressing concerns about their behavior and urging them to comply with infection control protocols.

Explanation: While addressing the issue directly may be commendable, involving appropriate authorities ensures a systematic response to mitigate risks and enforce compliance.

Response 3: Document instances of non-compliance and discuss concerns with peers, seeking validation of observations before escalating the issue.

Explanation: While collaboration and documentation are valuable, delays in reporting may prolong exposure to potential health hazards, compromising patient and staff safety.

Response 4: Conduct a thorough review of infection control protocols and offer to provide additional training or resources to the healthcare provider to ensure they understand and adhere to best practices.

Explanation: This response demonstrates a commitment to constructive problem-solving and supporting colleagues in maintaining a safe healthcare environment.

Response 5: Organize a team meeting to discuss the importance of infection control measures and brainstorm strategies to improve compliance among all staff members, fostering a culture of accountability and safety.

Explanation: Engaging colleagues in collaborative efforts to address systemic issues promotes shared responsibility for patient safety and enhances overall healthcare quality.

AAMC Professional Readiness Preparation

Tailor and optimise your AAMC preparation with our experienced Medicin tutors.

Morehouse School of Medicine AAMC PREview Example Scenarios

You discover that a fellow student has been plagiarizing coursework, copying verbatim from online sources without attribution.

Response 1: Confront the student privately, expressing concern about the academic integrity violation and encouraging them to rectify the situation with proper citations or seek assistance from instructors.

Response 2: Report the incident to the academic integrity committee or relevant faculty members, providing evidence of plagiarism and advocating for appropriate disciplinary action.

Response 3: Ignore the plagiarism, reasoning that it’s not your responsibility to police fellow students’ academic conduct.

Response 4: Discuss the importance of academic integrity with the student and offer support in developing effective study and research skills to avoid future instances of plagiarism.

Response 5: Encourage the student to seek guidance from academic support services or tutoring resources to improve their understanding of citation practices and academic honesty standards.

You can find more questions in our Question Bank here.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course