Keating Chambers: Pupillage Interview Past Questions

Pupillage Application Specialists

Keating Chambers: Key Information

Keating Chambers stands as a preeminent set of commercial barristers in the United Kingdom, comprising 69 barristers, including 33 King’s Counsel and 36 Juniors, along with seven international members. With a robust domestic and international practice, they offer specialised services in areas such as construction and engineering, energy, offshore construction, procurement, and more. Keating Chambers regularly represents clients in various divisions of the High Court, the Court of Appeal, the Privy Council, and the UK’s Supreme Court. They are also adept in alternative dispute resolution, including UK and international arbitration, mediation, and expert determination. The commitment to advocacy, drafting, and advisory services at all levels contributes to their esteemed reputation. Keating Chambers is distinguished not only for its professional excellence but also for its commitment to diversity and inclusion. They seek candidates from various backgrounds, reflecting the broad spectrum of society, and have implemented a comprehensive, multi-stage selection process to ensure that the best candidates are chosen, reflecting the diversity and richness of the community they serve.

Online Course

Techniques, Tutorials & Past Pupillage Interview Questions & Model Answers

Pupillage Interview Tuition

One to One Support With A Pupillage Interview Specialist. Your First Choice Chambers.

Resources & Articles

Tips, Techniques & Insight from Interviewers & Current Barristers.

Keating Chambers: Interview Information

Keating Chambers employs a rigorous two-part interview process as part of their five-stage selection process. The first interview comprises a randomly allocated advocacy exercise on non-legal topics, focusing on articulate and structured arguments, and standardised, structured questions linked to the candidate’s application. The second interview includes a pre-prepared oral presentation on a non-legal topic chosen by the candidate, followed by a discussion in conference format with the interview panel acting as instructing solicitors. These interviews assess intellectual ability, team working skills, and written and oral advocacy capabilities. The criteria are clear and defined, allowing Keating Chambers to assess the candidates holistically, seeking those who best align with their intellectual, collaborative, and communicative demands. The unique approach combines traditional assessment with innovative elements, reflecting Keating Chambers’ commitment to identifying and nurturing talent across diverse backgrounds and interests.

Pupillage Interview Services

Tailor and optimise your Pupillage Application with our 1-1 Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Pupillage Interview Question Bank & Online Course

Keating Chambers Application Questions and Answers

Please provide evidence of your ability to work in a team. In doing so, please evidence how you have met the definition of the criterion.

My team-working abilities were demonstrated during a local environmental initiative. As the project lead, I fostered a collaborative environment, aligning the team with clear, shared goals. My role involved planning and executing tasks, effectively delegating responsibilities based on individual skills.

Emphasising mutual support, I cultivated a space where team members felt valued and heard, ensuring productive communication. This involved actively addressing and resolving conflicts, maintaining a focus on our common objectives. The project’s success, marked by a significant community impact, was a testament to our cohesive teamwork and my ability to integrate diverse perspectives and skills harmoniously.

The experience solidified my belief in the power of collaborative effort and the importance of understanding and respecting each team member’s contribution. It underscored my ability to lead a team effectively, a skill crucial in the legal field where collaborative endeavours are frequent.

Please provide evidence of your use of written advocacy. In doing so, please evidence how you have met the definition in parts 1 and 2 of the criterion.

My written advocacy skills were refined during an internship at a legal firm, where I drafted a critical memorandum for a high-stakes case. Tasked with presenting a nuanced argument, I focused on clarity, structure, and precision. I analysed vast case materials, succinctly identifying and articulating key legal points.

Anticipating opposing arguments, I integrated rebuttals and counterpoints to fortify our stance. My document was carefully reviewed for clarity and accuracy, ensuring it met professional standards. Feedback from senior attorneys commended my ability to distill complex legal issues into a compelling and coherent narrative. This task highlighted my proficiency in crafting persuasive written arguments, vital for a barrister. It showcased my capacity to articulate complex legal theories and facts succinctly, a skill that is essential in delivering effective written advocacy in the courtroom.

Please provide evidence of your use of oral advocacy. In doing so, please evidence how you have met the definition of the criterion.

My oral advocacy skills were significantly developed through participation in a university debate team. I spearheaded a challenging debate on a contentious legal topic, requiring structured, relevant, and cogent argumentation. I prepared meticulously, anticipating counterarguments to maintain a robust position. My presentation was characterised by clarity and eloquence, effectively engaging the audience and judges. During the debate, I adeptly handled interventions, demonstrating composure and adaptability while steadfastly advocating our stance. This experience was pivotal in honing my oral advocacy skills, particularly in articulating arguments persuasively and responding to unexpected challenges. Feedback from judges and peers highlighted my ability to present complex arguments lucidly and convincingly, a skill crucial for courtroom success. This experience reinforced my capability to think quickly, respond effectively to dynamic situations, and maintain a persuasive argument under pressure, skills indispensable for a career in law

Keating Chambers Past and Example Interview Questions

Intellectual Ability

  • How do you approach analysing complex legal issues?
  • Can you describe an experience where you identified relevant points in a voluminous set of materials?
  • How would you apply legal rules to a hypothetical situation to assess the outcome?
  • How do you manage to think and respond effectively under pressure?

Ability to Work in Teams

  • Describe an experience where you collaborated to achieve a shared goal.
  • How do you recognize and respect the needs and skills of other team members?
  • Can you share an example of effective delegation within a team?
  • How do you approach conflict within a team, and can you provide an example?

Written Advocacy

  • How do you structure your written arguments to be clear and articulate?
  • Can you describe a time when you successfully anticipated and addressed opposing arguments in writing?
  • What techniques do you use to ensure that your written documents are free of grammatical errors?

Oral Advocacy

  • How do you prepare to present structured and relevant arguments orally?
  • Can you share an example where you effectively anticipated and addressed opposing arguments?
  • How do you manage interventions during oral arguments while maintaining your position?

Diversity and Inclusion

  • How have you contributed to promoting diversity and inclusion within your previous roles?
  • What do you believe is the importance of diversity within the legal profession?

Practice Areas (e.g., Construction, Energy, Procurement)

  • Why are you interested in the practice area of construction and engineering law?
  • Can you discuss a case or project related to energy and natural resources that you’ve worked on?
  • What attracts you to offshore construction and marine engineering law?
  • How would you approach a case involving procurement and competition?

Alternative Dispute Resolution

  • Can you discuss your experience with UK and international arbitration?
  • How have you used mediation in resolving disputes?
  • What’s your opinion on the effectiveness of dispute review boards?

Professional Excellence

  • How do you ensure that your legal work is of the highest standard?
  • Can you provide an example of your exceptional drafting skills?

Community and Client Service

  • How do you approach client communication and service?
  • What do you believe sets Keating Chambers apart in terms of advocacy and advisory services?

International Practice

  • Can you discuss your experience with international legal matters?
  • How do you approach cross-border disputes?

Pupillage Online Course & Question Bank

Articles & Resources

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course