Test

Hardest Accounting & Consulting Interview Questions

Accounting & Consulting Application Specialists

Introduction

Interviews for positions at the main accounting and consulting firms are known for their challenging questions designed to test candidates’ technical knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and critical thinking skills. While preparing for these interviews, it’s crucial to be ready for some of the toughest questions you might face.

Online Course

Techniques, Tutorials & Past Accounting & Consulting Interview Questions & Model Answers

Interview Tuition

One to One Support With An Accounting & Consulting Interview Specialist. Secure Your First Choice.

Mock Interviews

Schedule Mock Interviews With Our Experienced Tutors To Perfect Your Approach

If you could choose to eliminate either the balance sheet or the income statement, which would you choose and why?

This is a challenging question as both statements are crucial for understanding a company’s financial position. However, if forced to choose, I would eliminate the balance sheet and retain the income statement. The income statement provides a dynamic view of a company’s financial performance over time, showing revenues, expenses, and profitability. This information is critical for assessing a company’s operational efficiency, pricing strategies, and overall financial health. By retaining the income statement, we can still derive some balance sheet information indirectly.

For instance, we can estimate changes in assets and liabilities through the cash flow statement, which can be constructed using income statement data and additional information about non-cash transactions. While this wouldn’t provide a complete picture of the company’s financial position at a specific point in time, it would allow for some assessment of the company’s financial structure and liquidity.

Ultimately, the income statement’s ability to show a company’s capacity to generate profit over time makes it, in my opinion, more indispensable for decision-making purposes. However, I acknowledge that this choice involves significant trade-offs and would depend on the specific analytical needs at hand.

Explain the concept of negative goodwill and how it's treated in accounting.

Negative goodwill, also known as a bargain purchase, occurs when a company acquires another business for less than the fair market value of its net identifiable assets. This situation is relatively rare but can happen in distressed sales or when a seller is particularly motivated to divest quickly.

In accounting, negative goodwill is treated as a gain. According to IFRS 3 and ASC 805, the acquirer should first reassess whether all acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been identified correctly and measured accurately. If negative goodwill still exists after this reassessment, it’s recognized immediately as a gain in the income statement.

This treatment reflects the economic reality of the transaction – the acquirer has essentially made a profitable purchase by buying assets for less than their fair value. However, it’s crucial to note that the presence of negative goodwill often triggers additional scrutiny from auditors and regulators, as it’s an unusual occurrence that could potentially indicate errors in valuation or other underlying issues. The concept of negative goodwill underscores the importance of accurate valuation in business combinations and highlights the complexities involved in accounting for mergers and acquisitions.

How would you explain the difference between LIFO and FIFO inventory methods to a client, and what factors would you consider when recommending one over the other?

LIFO (Last-In, First-Out) and FIFO (First-In, First-Out) are inventory valuation methods that can significantly impact a company’s financial statements. I’d explain to the client that FIFO assumes the oldest inventory items are sold first, while LIFO assumes the newest items are sold first.

In recommending one method over the other, I’d consider several factors. First, I’d look at industry norms, as some sectors traditionally prefer one method over the other. The characteristics of the inventory itself are also crucial – for perishable goods, FIFO often makes more practical sense. Tax implications play a significant role too. In inflationary environments, LIFO can result in lower taxable income as it matches current costs with current revenues.

The impact on financial statements is another key consideration. FIFO typically results in a higher ending inventory value and thus a stronger balance sheet, while LIFO can lead to lower reported profits in inflationary times. It’s also important that the chosen method reflects the actual physical flow of goods as closely as possible.

International considerations can’t be overlooked either. LIFO is not allowed under IFRS, so companies with international operations or aspirations might prefer FIFO for consistency. Lastly, management’s objectives – whether the focus is on presenting a stronger balance sheet or minimizing taxes – can influence the decision.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the client’s specific circumstances and strategic goals. It’s crucial to help them understand the long-term implications of each method and how it aligns with their business strategy and reporting needs.

Accounting & Consulting Interview Services

Tailor and optimise your Application with our 1-1 Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Accounting & Consulting Interview Question Bank & Online Course

Describe a situation where the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) might not provide the most accurate representation of a company's financial position. How would you handle this?

One situation where GAAP might not provide the most accurate representation is in the valuation of intangible assets, particularly internally developed intangibles. Under GAAP, most internally generated intangible assets, such as brands or customer relationships, are not recognized on the balance sheet. This can lead to significant undervaluation of companies with strong brands or proprietary technologies.

For example, a technology company might invest heavily in R&D to develop a revolutionary software platform. While these costs are expensed as incurred under GAAP, the resulting intellectual property could be the company’s most valuable asset. This discrepancy between accounting value and economic reality can lead to a significant understatement of the company’s true worth.

In handling this situation, I would ensure full compliance with GAAP in the primary financial statements, as this is a regulatory requirement. However, I would also utilize the notes to the financial statements to provide additional context and information about these valuable intangibles. This could include detailed disclosures about R&D activities, the nature of the company’s intellectual property, and qualitative information about brand strength or customer relationships.

I might consider preparing supplementary non-GAAP disclosures that attempt to quantify the value of these assets, clearly labeling them as such to avoid any confusion with the GAAP financial statements. This could involve working with valuation experts to develop reasonable estimates of the value of these intangibles.

Lastly, I would advise management on the importance of effectively communicating the company’s value proposition to stakeholders, highlighting the significance of these unrecognized assets in investor presentations and annual reports. This approach maintains compliance while providing a more comprehensive view of the company’s true financial position and potential for future value creation.

If a company's return on equity (ROE) has been consistently increasing over the past five years, does this necessarily mean the company is performing well? What other factors would you consider?

While a consistently increasing ROE can be a positive indicator, it doesn’t necessarily mean a company is performing well. Several other factors need to be considered to get a comprehensive view of the company’s performance.

First, we need to look at the company’s leverage. Higher debt levels can inflate ROE without improving actual performance, as increased borrowing can boost net income in the short term while equity remains constant. Similarly, share buybacks can artificially increase ROE by reducing the number of outstanding shares, thereby decreasing equity.

The quality and sustainability of earnings is another crucial factor. We need to examine whether the ROE growth is driven by sustainable improvements in core operations or by non-recurring items and one-time gains. High ROE could also potentially mask aggressive accounting practices, so a thorough analysis of the company’s accounting policies and any changes over time is essential.

Asset efficiency is another important consideration that ROE doesn’t directly capture. A company might have a high ROE but be underutilizing its assets. Therefore, examining metrics like Return on Assets (ROA) alongside ROE can provide a more complete picture of how efficiently the company is using all of its resources.

Industry comparisons are also vital. An increasing ROE should be benchmarked against industry peers to understand if the company is outperforming its competitors or simply riding an industry-wide trend.

We should also consider the company’s investment in future growth. A high ROE could result from underinvestment in areas like R&D or capital expenditures, which might boost short-term returns but compromise long-term competitiveness.

Lastly, it’s crucial to look at the company’s cash flow. Strong ROE doesn’t always correlate with healthy cash flows, and a company with high profitability on paper might still face liquidity issues if it’s unable to convert those profits into cash.

To get a truly comprehensive view of performance, I’d analyze these factors alongside ROE, looking at trends over time and in comparison to industry benchmarks. This holistic approach provides a more accurate assessment of a company’s financial health, performance, and prospects for sustainable growth.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course