Answering Clerkship Interview Questions on Understanding of the Supreme Court

Clerkship Application Specialists

When interviewing for a judicial clerkship, particularly at the federal level, you may be asked questions that assess your understanding of the Supreme Court, its role in the legal system, and its recent jurisprudence. These questions aim to gauge your legal knowledge, your ability to analyze complex legal issues, and your perspective on the Court’s impact on the law and society. To effectively answer these questions, follow this 5-step process tailored to demonstrating your understanding of the Supreme Court:

Online Course

Techniques, Tutorials & Past Clerkship Interview Questions & Model Answers

Clerkship Interview Tuition

One to One Support With A Clerkship Interview Specialist. Secure First Choice.

Mock Interviews

Schedule Mock Interviews With Our Experienced Tutors To Perfect Your Approach

Step 1: Review the Court’s recent terms and landmark decisions

Before the interview, thoroughly review the Supreme Court’s docket and decisions from the most recent terms. Pay particular attention to:

– High-profile or controversial cases that garnered significant public attention

– Cases that marked a shift or development in the Court’s jurisprudence

– Decisions that are particularly relevant to the clerkship you are applying for (e.g., cases in the judge’s area of expertise or circuit)


Step 2: Analyze the Court’s composition and dynamics

In addition to reviewing specific cases, consider the current composition and dynamics of the Court. Reflect on:

– The judicial philosophies and approaches of individual justices

– The balance of the Court and potential swing votes on key issues

– The role of the Chief Justice in shaping the Court’s agenda and decisions

– Potential coalitions or divisions among the justices on different areas of law


Step 3: Connect the Court’s decisions to broader legal and societal trends

As you discuss specific cases or the Court’s overall jurisprudence, aim to connect the Court’s decisions to broader legal and societal trends. Consider:

– How the Court’s decisions reflect or shape evolving social, political, or cultural values

– How the Court’s approach to certain issues (e.g., federalism, individual rights, or statutory interpretation) may impact other areas of law

– How the Court’s decisions may influence the work of lower courts, including the court you are applying to clerk for

– How the Court’s jurisprudence may interact with or prompt action from the other branches of government


Step 4: Offer respectful and well-reasoned critiques

While it’s important to demonstrate respect for the Court as an institution, don’t be afraid to offer thoughtful and well-reasoned critiques of specific decisions or aspects of the Court’s jurisprudence. When offering a critique:

– Ground your analysis in legal principles and precedent, rather than personal or political opinions

– Acknowledge counterarguments or alternative perspectives, even if you ultimately disagree with them

– Focus on the legal reasoning or implications of a decision, rather than attacking individual justices

– Emphasize your commitment to the rule of law and your respect for the Court’s authority, even when questioning specific decisions


Step 5: Practice discussing the Court with nuance and diplomacy

Given the often-controversial nature of Supreme Court cases, it’s important to practice discussing the Court’s decisions and dynamics with nuance and diplomacy. As you prepare for your interview:

– Practice articulating your analysis in a clear, concise, and balanced manner

– Avoid overly partisan or inflammatory language, even when discussing contentious issues

– Be prepared to acknowledge the complexity and difficulty of the legal questions facing the Court

– Emphasize your respect for the Court as an institution and your commitment to impartial and principled legal analysis

Clerkship Interview Services

Tailor and optimise your Clerkship Application with our 1-1 Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Clerkship Interview Question Bank & Online Course

Example Question and Answer:

Question: "Can you discuss a recent Supreme Court decision that you found particularly significant or challenging, and explain your perspective on the Court's reasoning and the potential implications of the decision?"


“One recent Supreme Court decision that I found both significant and challenging was Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and held that the Constitution does not protect a right to abortion.

From a legal perspective, the Dobbs decision marked a major shift in the Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its approach to substantive due process more broadly. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Alito, held that the right to abortion was not deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition and was not essential to the concept of ordered liberty. In reaching this conclusion, the Court expressly rejected the reasoning of Roe and Casey, which had grounded the right to abortion in the broader right to privacy.

While I have great respect for the Court and the difficult task of interpreting the Constitution, I found aspects of the majority’s reasoning troubling. In particular, I was concerned by the narrow historical lens the Court used to assess the existence of a constitutional right, and the potential implications of this approach for other rights grounded in substantive due process, such as same-sex marriage or contraception.

At the same time, I thought the dissenting opinions raised important points about the Court’s obligation to respect its own precedent and the profound societal reliance on the right to abortion recognized in Roe and Casey. The dissents also highlighted the significant real-world consequences of the decision for women’s autonomy, health, and equality.

Beyond the legal reasoning, the Dobbs decision is significant for its profound societal and political implications. By returning the issue of abortion to the states, the decision has sparked intense debate and legislative activity across the country, with some states moving to restrict abortion access and others seeking to protect it. The decision has also raised questions about the Court’s legitimacy and its role in deciding deeply contested moral and social issues.

As a future law clerk and legal professional, I believe it’s important to approach complex and controversial decisions like Dobbs with nuance, empathy, and a commitment to principled legal analysis. While I may have reservations about aspects of the Court’s reasoning, I respect the difficult task the justices face in interpreting the Constitution and the importance of judicial independence and the rule of law.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Intensive BMAT Course

BMAT Timetable

The BMAT Course