10 Most Common Law School Interview Questions and Model Answers
Law Application & Interview Preparation Specialists
Law School interview preparation requires a great deal of thought about a student’s broad life experiences and goals. This article focuses on the most high-yield, common questions. You can find more questions in our Law question bank.
Motivation for Law
Why do you want to study law instead of other fields?
From an early age, I’ve been intrigued by the critical role that law plays in our society. I appreciate the stability it offers while also allowing for dynamic change. I was drawn to law because it touches virtually every aspect of life, from the contracts we sign, to the policies that govern our actions, and the resolution of disputes. Unlike other disciplines, the law is not confined to one sector or industry, but rather it serves as the foundation of societal organisation. The study of law promises a challenging intellectual journey and the ability to make meaningful contributions to society.
What specific areas of law are you interested in and why?
I am particularly drawn to Human Rights and International Law. I’ve always been passionate about global events and social justice issues. It amazes me how international law can influence the way states act and interact. In the context of human rights, I’ve been inspired by the work of lawyers who fight for the rights of individuals and push for changes that benefit societies at large. I hope to use my legal knowledge to contribute positively to these areas, to uphold justice, and to make a tangible difference in people’s lives.
Can you describe a legal issue or case in the news that has interested you recently and explain why?
Recently, I’ve been engrossed by the legal discussions around tech companies and data protection. One case that stands out is the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal. The case raised pertinent questions about privacy rights, consent, and how companies use and share personal data. What intrigued me most was the legal complexity surrounding data protection and the tangible impact these issues have on society at large. It revealed the intricate relationship between law, technology, and society and underscored the importance of law in governing emerging technologies, which is an area I’m keen to explore further during my legal studies.
Can you provide an example of a time you had to manage your time effectively to meet strict deadlines?
Last year, I served as the editor of our school newspaper while simultaneously preparing for A-level exams. The demands of these roles were immense, requiring strategic planning and effective time management. I divided each week into academic and extracurricular periods, setting daily goals to ensure a steady progress. I implemented a system for the newspaper where each section had deadlines staggered throughout the month, reducing last-minute rushes. I also liaised with contributors to ensure they were on track. Meanwhile, I structured my study time around the newspaper’s production cycle. I used revision techniques such as active recall and spaced repetition to maximise efficiency. Despite the pressure, I successfully maintained high academic performance and oversaw the publication of monthly editions of the newspaper, achieving a balance that seemed impossible at first.
Describe a situation where you displayed resilience in the face of adversity.
I played a key role in our school’s debating team. In one competition, we suffered a significant defeat early on. This was disheartening for the team, impacting our morale and confidence. Instead of allowing this setback to deter us, I viewed it as an opportunity for growth. I organised additional practice sessions and sought feedback from judges to identify areas for improvement. This resilient attitude began to infuse the rest of the team. Our determination paid off when we advanced to the national level of the competition. This experience taught me that resilience often lies not in avoiding failure, but in how we respond to it.
Can you give an example of when you have had to convince someone to accept your point of view?
During a Model United Nations conference, I represented a nation with a viewpoint that was unpopular within my committee. I needed to gain support for my position to pass a resolution. Instead of shying away from my stance, I engaged in research, preparing robust arguments supported by evidence. I engaged in respectful dialogue with my peers, acknowledging their concerns while effectively communicating my nation’s viewpoint. By demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic and using diplomatic negotiation skills, I gradually convinced several delegates to support our resolution, which eventually passed. This experience taught me the power of persuasive communication in achieving consensus.
Law University Interview Services
Tailor and optimise your Law Application with our 1-1 Law Admissions Specialists or prepare in your own time with our Law University Online Course & Question Bank
Problem Solving and Situational Judgement
Describe a time when you had to solve a complex problem. What steps did you take and what was the outcome?
While working on a project for my Economics class, I encountered a complex problem regarding the application of a theoretical model to a real-world scenario. The data we collected wasn’t aligning with our theoretical predictions. To resolve this, I started by thoroughly reviewing our data collection and analysis process, which helped me identify some inconsistencies. I then facilitated a meeting with our team, where we discussed these issues and brainstormed solutions. We decided to revise our data collection methodology and apply different economic models. We retested our hypotheses, and this time the results were more consistent with our predictions. Our ability to troubleshoot the problem resulted in a successful project and a greater understanding of the application of economic theories.
Can you discuss an ethical dilemma you have encountered, and how you dealt with it?
During a group project, a team member suggested we use a portion of a previous year’s work, which was available online. This posed an ethical dilemma: while this could make our work easier, it verged on academic dishonesty. I addressed the issue by discussing the implications of such action, emphasising that learning is more important than easy outcomes and that plagiarism could lead to severe consequences. We collectively agreed to generate our original work and use the available resources only for inspiration and understanding.
Imagine you have two deadlines approaching at the same time. How would you handle this situation?
If faced with two simultaneous deadlines, I’d start by accurately assessing the tasks involved in each project. I would prioritise tasks based on their importance, urgency, and the effort required. Next, I’d create a detailed timetable that effectively distributes my time between the two projects. I’d ensure regular breaks to avoid burnout. If necessary, I’d communicate with the respective teachers or project leaders about the situation. This proactive approach, prioritisation and communication strategy usually results in successful completion of tasks.
You're working on a group project and there's a conflict between two group members that's affecting the group's progress. How would you handle this situation?
In such a scenario, my initial step would be to facilitate a dialogue between the conflicting members in a neutral setting. I would encourage them to express their viewpoints and listen to each other’s perspectives. If the conflict stems from a misunderstanding, clear communication might resolve it. If it’s more deep-seated, I would suggest finding a compromise or seeking input from the rest of the team or a supervisor. Through respectful communication and problem-solving, we could mitigate the conflict and refocus on our shared goal.